Freeciv trade for free#
Freeciv trade mods#

The FreeCiv governor is a solver where you input your goals (maximize science vs maximize gold) and then the solver solves the optimal placement.īut it only works if the human gives it the right goals.Įven with a science focused build, a city in rapture will generate more science. But science is better in the long run (a heavy science build can get ironclad battleships by 0AD in game time) Well, basically, FreeCiv-web vs FreeCiv-GTK/QT flamewars in a nutshell.ĭuring war, gold is useful in Civ as it can instantly create units. and if so, rebalance the game in this field. The community needs to unify and decide if this version of the game is how it should be.

Freeciv trade mods#

It plays like a macro'd up / steroids version of Civ2 + minor mods as a result. As well as the use of 'symmetrical island maps' to ensure everyone has equal starting-positions, and the first to deploy 'concurrent turns' (long before Civ5 did). The solvers to make provably optimal choices (well, at least 'locally optimal', such as most trade from a collection of 12-cities trade routes + auto-caravan decisions). The 'core' of FreeCiv is pretty incredible. So many times do I look at my citizens placement and realize that the AI-placement of citizens is terrible compared to the FreeCiv solver. But knowing that these lower-level items are 'solved' by solver-systems makes it really, really difficult to go back to Civ5 / Civ6 (!!). Its one additional step to learn before you can be an effective, competitive, FreeCiv player.

Freeciv trade for free#

Is the use of arcane constraint-solvers part of the metagame? If deployed for free so that everyone can use them, is that fair? Some want to use FreeCiv-Web (and without the Governor / Trade route solvers, its a very different game), others like me prefer to play highly-optimal Civ2-like games.įreeCiv's solvers (both the Governor solver, and the Trade Route solver) presents a difficult question to the community. But the community seems split and fractured. at least last time I checked) also is a major advantage to the players who use it.įreeCiv is likely a highly competitive, highly optimized game. The use of optimal trade routes (with a good solver available in the FreeCiv-GTK client, but not in QT. (especially in auto-calculating rapture situations)

Proper use of it leads to cascading advantages over your foes however, so its a must have to learn. But the use of this solver-engine is arcane. QT-client solves a lot of the issues though, and hopefully will evolve into something better.įreeCiv got an incredible 'solver' embedded into its engine, allowing you to optimally place your citizens. They've backported some things from Civ4/5/6, like hex-maps, culture, and also changed some mechanics to better interact with these backported items (Democracy's 'Deployed Troops' penalty now extends to your culture-zone, instead of cities/fortresses only, which makes sense).įreeCiv in general suffers from outdated UI-choices. For example, if two otherwise-identical cities are both 16 squares away, but one is horizontally distant while the other is diagonally distant, the continuing trade bonus will be the same for both, but the initial bonus for the diagonal city will be twice as large.FreeCiv has largely succeeded in making a 'more fun' Civ2-like environment. The 'initial bonus' calculation uses the 'Manhattan metric', while the 'continuing trade' calculation uses the number of squares covered. (Curiously, on a square-grid map, the 'initial bonus' and 'continuing trade' calculations use different methods to measure the distance between the cities. Under the default ruleset, the type bonus is 1 for same owner/same continent, 2 if the owner or continent is different, and 4 if both the owner and continent are different.

The continuing trade bonus is the sum of the sizes of the two cities involved and the distance between them, multiplied by a factor based on the type of trade route. Crossing oceans or trading with a different civilization doesn't affect this bonus. Under the default ruleset, the 'city trade bonus' is reduced by 33% when you discover 'Railroad', and by another 33% when you discover 'Flight', for a cumulative penalty of 56%. The initial bonus is based on the sum of the trade production of each city, times the distance between them, times a 'city trade bonus', with various scaling factors applied.